Current:Home > ContactWisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections -Wealth Pursuit Network
Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections
View
Date:2025-04-15 05:18:11
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday in a case brought by Republicans who want to bar the use of mobile voting vans in the presidential battleground state.
Such vans — a single van, actually — were used just once, in Racine in 2022. It allowed voters to cast absentee ballots in the two weeks leading up to the election. Racine, the Democratic National Committee and others say nothing in state law prohibits the use of voting vans.
Whatever the court decides will not affect the November election, as a ruling isn’t expected until later and no towns or cities asked to use alternative voting locations for this election before the deadline to do so passed. But the ruling will determine whether mobile voting sites can be used in future elections.
Republicans argue it is against state law to operate mobile voting sites, that their repeated use would increase the chances of voter fraud, and that the one in Racine was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Wisconsin law prohibits locating any early voting site in a place that gives an advantage to any political party. There are other limitations on early voting sites, including a requirement that they be “as near as practicable” to the clerk’s office.
For the 2022 election, Racine city Clerk Tara McMenamin and the city “had a goal of making voting accessible to as many eligible voters as possible, and the voting locations were as close as practicable to the municipal clerk’s office while achieving that goal and complying with federal law,” the city’s attorney argued in filings with the court.
Racine purchased its van with grant money from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a nonprofit funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
Wisconsin voters in April approved a constitutional amendment banning the use of private money to help run elections.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled for two weeks across the city, allowing voters to cast in-person absentee ballots in 21 different locations.
Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. He argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
“Whether McMenamin’s intention was to create this turnout advantage for Democrats or not, that is precisely what she did through the sites she selected,” Brown argued in a brief filed with the state Supreme Court.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the 2022 election, saying there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. Brown sued.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Today’s news: Follow live updates from the campaign trail from the AP.
- Ground Game: Sign up for AP’s weekly politics newsletter to get it in your inbox every Monday.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
Brown sued, and in January, a Racine County Circuit Court judge sided with Republicans, ruling that state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in June kept that ruling in place pending its consideration of the case, which effectively meant the use of mobile voting sites would not be allowed in the upcoming presidential election. The court also kept in place the same rules that have been in place since 2016 for determining the location of early voting sites. The deadline for selecting those sites for use in the November election was in June.
veryGood! (3671)
Related
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Connecticut Sun's Alyssa Thomas becomes first WNBA player to record 20-20-10 triple-double
- Can't finish a book because of your attention span? 'Yellowface' will keep the pages turning
- Iran’s Revolutionary Guard runs drill on disputed islands as US military presence in region grows
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Gwyneth Paltrow invites fans to stay at Montecito guesthouse with Airbnb: 'Hope to host you soon'
- Child shoots and kills another child with a rifle moments after they were playing with Nerf guns, Alaska troopers say
- UAW to show list of economic demands to automakers this week, will seek worker pay if plants close
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Teamsters: Yellow trucking company headed for bankruptcy, putting 30,000 jobs at risk
Ranking
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Sales are way down at a Florida flea market. A new immigration law could be to blame.
- How racism became a marketing tool for country music
- Pair mortally wounded in shootout with Ohio state troopers following pursuits, kidnapping
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Lizzo lawsuit: Singer sued by dancers for 'demoralizing' weight shaming, sexual harassment
- Todd and Julie Chrisley Haven't Spoken Since Entering Prison 6 Months Ago
- Trump’s monthslong effort to change results became criminal, indictment says. Follow live updates
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
What are the odds of winning Mega Millions? You have a better chance of dying in shark attack
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s lawyers say attempt to jail him before trial is wrong
X marks the lawsuit: Elon Musk’s social media company sues nonprofit highlighting site’s hate speech
Average rate on 30
U.S. women advance to World Cup knockout stage — but a bigger victory was already secured off the field
'Arrow' star Stephen Amell voices frustration over actors strike: 'I do not support striking'
Trucking works to expand diversity, partly due to a nationwide shortage of drivers