Current:Home > ContactFacebook owner, Microsoft, X and Match side with Epic Games in Apple lawsuit -Wealth Pursuit Network
Facebook owner, Microsoft, X and Match side with Epic Games in Apple lawsuit
View
Date:2025-04-17 23:09:55
Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Elon Musk's X and Match Group on Wednesday joined "Fortnite" video game maker Epic Games' protest that Apple has failed to honor a court-ordered injunction governing payments in its lucrative App Store.
The technology companies, which developed some of the most popular apps in the App Store, said Apple was in "clear violation" of the Sept. 2021 injunction by making it difficult to steer consumers to cheaper means to pay for digital content.
Apple declined to comment specifically on the accusation, which was contained in a filing with the Oakland, California, federal court.
It referred to its Jan. 16 statement that it had fully complied with the injunction, which it said would protect consumers and "the integrity of Apple's ecosystem" while ensuring that developers do not get a free ride.
Epic had sued Apple in 2020, saying it violated antitrust law by requiring consumers to obtain apps through the App Store and charging developers up to 30% commissions on purchases.
The injunction required Apple to let developers provide links and buttons to direct consumers to alternative payment options.
Last week, Epic demanded that Apple be held in contempt, saying new rules and a new 27% fee on developers made the links effectively useless.
In Wednesday's filing, the technology companies said Apple's conduct "for all practical purposes" entrenches anti-steering rules that the court found illegal, propping up Apple's "excessive" commissions and harming consumers and developers.
"Apple's restrictions on where and how developers can communicate with their users about their options for purchasing in-app content create significant barriers to competition and artificially inflate prices," the filing said.
TikTok ban:House passes TikTok bill. Are TikTok's days numbered? What you need to know.
In January, the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to hear Apple's appeal from the injunction. It also decided against hearing Epic's appeal of lower court findings that Apple's policies did not violate federal antitrust law.
Apple has until April 3 to formally respond to Epic's filing. The company is based in Cupertino, California, while Epic is based in Cary, North Carolina.
The case is Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 20-05640.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York. Editing by Bill Berkrot.
veryGood! (59316)
Related
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Women's Sweet 16 bold predictions for Friday games: Notre Dame, Stanford see dance end
- NFL’s newest owner joins the club of taking stock of low grades on NFLPA report card
- From Michigan to Nebraska, Midwest States Face an Early Wildfire Season
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Excavation at French hotel reveals a medieval castle with a moat, coins and jewelry
- Down ACC? Think again. Conference reminding all it's still the king of March Madness.
- Tax return extensions: Why you should (or shouldn't) do it and how to request one
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Florence Pugh gives playful sneak peek at 'Thunderbolts' set: 'I can show you some things'
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Judge rejects officers’ bid to erase charges in the case of a man paralyzed after police van ride
- Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers want to make public statements about stolen money. FBI says Murdaugh lied
- ‘Murder in progress': Police tried to spare attacker’s life as they saved woman from assault
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Fourth Wing Author Rebecca Yarros Reveals Release Date of 3rd Book in Her Series
- Photos released from on board the Dali ship as officials investigate Baltimore bridge collapse
- Five tough questions in the wake of the Baltimore Key Bridge collapse
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Terrence Shannon Jr. case shows how NIL can increase legal protection for college athletes
Judge rejects officers’ bid to erase charges in the case of a man paralyzed after police van ride
The Bankman-Fried verdict, explained
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Baltimore bridge rescues called off; insurers face billions in losses: Live updates
Truth Social’s stock price is soaring. It’s not just Trump supporters buying in.
Best, worst moves of NFL free agency 2024: Which signings will pay off? Which will fail?