Current:Home > reviewsMusk’s X tests $1 fee for new users in the Philippines and New Zealand in bid to target spam -Wealth Pursuit Network
Musk’s X tests $1 fee for new users in the Philippines and New Zealand in bid to target spam
View
Date:2025-04-15 10:36:41
LONDON (AP) — Elon Musk’s social media platform X has begun charging a $1 fee to new users in the Philippines and New Zealand, in a test designed to cut down on the spam and fake accounts flourishing on the site formerly known as Twitter.
The company said late Tuesday that it has started trying out the annual subscription method for new and unverified accounts. The program, dubbed Not a Bot, won’t apply to existing users.
It’s not clear why it only applies to New Zealand and the Philippines or why those countries were chosen.
“This new test was developed to bolster our already successful efforts to reduce spam, manipulation of our platform and bot activity, while balancing platform accessibility with the small fee amount,” the X support account tweeted. “It is not a profit driver.”
Since Musk bought X a year ago, he has introduced a slew of changes such as renaming the platform and gutting its workforce — including its content moderation team.
Outside watchdog groups say the changes have allowed misinformation to thrive on the platform, a problem that exploded after the Israel-Hamas war erupted.
Musk previously turned to premium subscriptions as a tactic to boost the financially struggling platform’s revenue.
One of his first product moves was to shake up the site’s blue check verification system by launching a service granting checks to anyone willing to pay $8 a month. A flood of impostor accounts forced the service’s temporary suspension days after launch.
Under the test, new subscribers will get access to basic functions like posting content, liking or bookmarking posts, and reposting, quoting or replying to posts from other accounts.
The platform said new users who don’t subscribe will only be able to read posts, watch videos and follow other accounts.
veryGood! (9244)
Related
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- How Massachusetts v. EPA Forced the U.S. Government to Take On Climate Change
- How an abortion pill ruling could threaten the FDA's regulatory authority
- How Massachusetts v. EPA Forced the U.S. Government to Take On Climate Change
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Why do some people get UTIs over and over? A new report holds clues
- A rehab center revives traumatized Ukrainian troops before their return to battle
- NFL Legend Jim Brown Dead at 87
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Gerard Piqué Gets Cozy With Girlfriend Clara Chia Marti After Shakira Breakup
Ranking
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- What we know about the Indiana industrial fire that's forced residents to evacuate
- How a Contrarian Scientist Helped Trump’s EPA Defy Mainstream Science
- These Amazon Travel Essentials Will Help You Stick To Your Daily Routine on Vacation
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- This Week in Clean Economy: Manufacturing Job Surge Seen for East Coast Offshore Wind
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, June 18, 2023
- This Week in Clean Economy: China Is Leading the Race for Clean Energy Jobs
Recommendation
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
On Father's Day Jim Gaffigan ponders the peculiar lives of childless men
From Antarctica to the Oceans, Climate Change Damage Is About to Get a Lot Worse, IPCC Warns
Netflix crew's whole boat exploded after back-to-back shark attacks in Hawaii: Like something out of 'Jaws'
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Why anti-abortion groups are citing the ideas of a 19th-century 'vice reformer'
California’s Landmark Clean Car Mandate: How It Works and What It Means
Can Planting a Trillion Trees Stop Climate Change? Scientists Say it’s a Lot More Complicated