Current:Home > Finance10 Senators Call for Investigation into EPA Pushing Scientists Off Advisory Boards -Wealth Pursuit Network
10 Senators Call for Investigation into EPA Pushing Scientists Off Advisory Boards
View
Date:2025-04-12 04:06:06
A group of Senate Democrats is calling for an expanded investigation into efforts by the Trump Environmental Protection Agency to effectively push independent scientists off key EPA advisory boards and replace them with scientists from the fossil fuel and chemical industries.
In a letter sent to the Government Accountability Office on Thursday, the 10 senators asked the GAO to investigate a new directive, issued by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Oct. 31, that restricts any scientist who has received EPA funding from serving on the agency’s scientific advisory panels.
Pruitt said the move was intended to clear up conflicts of interest and to rid advisory panel members of financial ties to the agency. But scientific groups, academics and advocacy organizations have all pointed out that it will mean the most experienced scientists—whose qualifications earn them government grants in the first place—will no longer be able to serve in these roles.
“The double-standard is striking: an academic scientist that receives an EPA grant for any purpose cannot provide independent advice on a completely different subject matter on any of EPA’s science advisory boards,” the senators wrote, “while industry scientists are presumed to have no inherent conflict even if their research is entirely funded by a company with a financial stake in an advisory board’s conclusions.”
Five days after Pruitt issued the directive, The Washington Post reported that he appointed 66 new members to advisory panels, many of them with ties to industries the agency regulates. Several panel members stepped down.
“Under this new policy, EPA will be replacing representatives of public and private universities including Harvard, Stanford, Ohio State University, and the University of Southern California with scientists who work for Phillips 66, Total, Southern Company, and the American Chemistry Council,” the senators wrote.
In response to a request for comment, an EPA spokesperson replied: “The Administrator has issued a directive which clearly states his policy with regard to grantees.” The agency did not respond to questions about whether new members will be required to sign conflict of interest declarations or undergo a review process.
Earlier this year, the EPA said it would not renew the terms of members of its broader Board of Scientific Counselors, and beyond EPA, the administration has allowed other scientific boards to expire altogether. In August, the acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) told members of an advisory panel for the National Climate Assessment that it would allow the panel’s charter to lapse.
The recent Pruitt directive is similar to legislation long pushed by Republicans in Congress, including a bill introduced earlier this year called the EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act.
Science organizations have pointed out that anyone receiving a federal grant undergoes a merit review, which scrutinizes their professional standards and ethics, and that grant applicants have to declare they have no conflicts of interest before receiving government grants.
“EPA’s decisions have real implications for the health and well-being of Americans and in some cases people worldwide,” wrote Chris McEntee, the executive director of the American Geophysical Union. “By curtailing the input of some of the most respected minds in science, Pruitt’s decision robs the agency, and by extension Americans, of a critically important resource.”
The senators’ letter on Thursday follows a previous request to the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, to investigate the EPA’s policies and procedures related to advisory panels.
veryGood! (28283)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Deion Sanders adds NFL heft to coaching staff at Colorado
- A Swiftie Super Bowl, a stumbling bank, and other indicators
- Bradley Cooper Gushes Over His Amazing Mom Ahead of Their Oscars 2024 Date
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Super Bowl 2024: Time, channel, halftime show, how to watch Chiefs vs. 49ers livestream
- Country Singer Parker McCollum and Wife Hallie Expecting First Baby
- Feds offer up to $10 million reward for info on Hive ransomware hackers
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Costco, Trader Joe's and Walmart products made with cheese linked to deadly listeria outbreak
Ranking
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Ed Dwight was to be the first Black astronaut. At 90, he’s finally getting his due
- Stage adaptation of Prince's Purple Rain to debut in Minneapolis next year
- Tommy Hilfiger takes over the Oyster Bar in Grand Central for a joyous New York-centric fashion show
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- A stepmother says her husband killed his 5-year-old and hid her body. His lawyers say she’s lying
- Texas A&M to close Qatar campus as school’s board notes instability in Middle East as factor
- US Sen. Coons and German Chancellor Scholz see double at Washington meeting
Recommendation
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
Colin Jost revealed as headliner for the 2024 White House Correspondents' Dinner
Nearly 200 abused corpses were found at a funeral home. Why did it take authorities years to act?
What is Wagyu? The beef has a 'unique, meltaway texture' but comes with a heavy price tag
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Investigators focus on suspect in Philadelphia area fire and shooting that left 6 dead, 2 hurt
Man who shoveled new channel into Lake Michigan convicted of 2 misdemeanors
Congressional age limit proposed in North Dakota in potential test case for nation